AIR POLLUTION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN 2005

Czech Hydrometeorological Institute - Air Quality Protection Division




 LIST OF FIGURES

Fig. –1 Scheme of ISKOs links to data sources and co-operating systems 2005
Fig. I.1 Total emissions of principal pollutants in the Czech Republic between 1990 and 2005
Fig. I.2 Changes in fuel structure in REZZO 1, 2004 as compared to 1990
Fig. I.3 Fuel consumption in REZZO 3 sources, 1992–2005
Fig. I.4 Changes in residential heating, 2005 as compared to 1991
Fig. I.5 Changes in REZZO 3 emission quantities at constant structure of flats and fuels (100 % = average for 2001–2005)
Fig. I.6 Particulate emission density from 5x5 km squares, 2004
Fig. I.7 Sulphur dioxide emission density from 5x5 km squares, 2004
Fig. I.8 Nitrogen oxides emission density from 5x5 km squares, 2004
Fig. I.9 CO emission density from 5x5 km squares, 2004
Fig. II.1.1 Major station networks of ambient air quality monitoring, 2005
Fig. II.1.2 Monitoring of principal pollutants in selected organisations – development
Fig. II.4.1 Field of the annual concentration of NO2 (3-D image), Prague agglomeration, 2005
Fig. II.4.2 Field of the annual concentration of benzo(a)pyrene (3-D image), Prague agglomeration, 2005
Fig. II.4.3 Field of the annual concentration of NO2 (3-D image), Brno agglomeration, 2005
Fig. II.4.4 Field of the annual concentration of benzo(a)pyrene (3-D image), Brno agglomeration, 2005
Fig. II.4.5 Field of the annual concentration of NO2 (3-D image), Moravian-Silesian agglomeration, 2005
Fig. II.4.6 Field of the annual concentration of benzo(a)pyrene (3-D image), Moravian-Silesian agglomeration, 2005
Fig. II.4.7 Average 24-hour PM10 concentrations, Moravian-Silesian agglomeration, February 2005
Fig. II.4.8 Interdependency between PM10 ambient air pollution and dispersion meteorological conditions
Fig. II.4.9 Trends of SO2, PM10 and NO2 annual characteristics in agglomerations, 1996–2005
Fig. II.4.10 4th highest 24-hour concentrations and maximal hourly concentrations of SO2 in 1996–2005 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.11 Field of the 4th highest 24-hour concentration of SO2 in 2005
Fig. II.4.12 Stations with the highest hourly concentrations of SO2 in 2005
Fig. II.4.13 Stations with the highest 24-hour concentrations of SO2 in 2005
Fig. II.4.14 36th highest 24-hour concentrations and annual average concentrations of PM10 in 1996–2005 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.15 Field of the 36th highest 24-hour concentration of PM10 in 2005
Fig. II.4.16 Field of annual average concentration of PM10 in 2005
Fig. II.4.17 Stations with the highest exceedence of LV for 24-hour concentrations of PM10 in 2005
Fig. II.4.18 Stations with the highest exceedence of LV for annual concentrations of PM10 in 2005
Fig. II.4.19 Numbers of exceedences of air pollution limit value for the 24-hour concentration of PM10 in 2005
Fig. II.4.20 Annual average PM10 concentrations at the stations with the exceedence of the limit value, 2001–2005
Fig. II.4.21 Annual average concentration of PM2.5 at stations in 2005
Fig. II.4.22 Average monthly PM2.5/PM10 proportions in 2005
Fig. II.4.23 19th highest hourly concentrations and annual average concentrations of NO2 in 1996–2005 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.24 Field of annual average concentration of NO2 in 2005
Fig. II.4.25 Stations with the highest hourly concentrations of NO2 in 2005
Fig. II.4.26 Maximum 8-hour running average concentrations of CO in 1996–2005 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.27 Stations with the highest values of maximum 8-hour running average concentrations of CO in 2005
Fig. II.4.28 Annual average concentrations of benzene in 1999–2005 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.29 Field of annual average concentration of benzene in the ambient air in 2005
Fig. II.4.30 24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual benzene concentrations in 2005
Fig. II.4.31 26th highest values of maximum 8-hour running average of surface ozone concentrations (three-year average) in 1996–2005 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.32 Field of the 26th highest maximum daily 8-hour running average of surface ozone concentration in three-year average, 2003–2005
Fig. II.4.33 Numbers of exceedences of the target limit value for the maximum daily 8-hour running average of surface ozone concentrations in three-year average, 2003–2005
Fig. II.4.34 Stations with the highest values of maximum daily 8-hour running average concentrations of surface ozone in 2003–2005
Fig. II.4.35 Annual average concentrations of lead in the ambient air in 1996–2005 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.36 1/14-day average concentrations of lead in the ambient air at selected stations in 2005
Fig. II.4.37 Annual average concentrations of cadmium in the ambient air in 1996–2005 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.38 Field of annual average concentration of cadmium in the ambient air in 2005
Fig. II.4.39 1/14-day average concentrations of cadmium in the ambient air at selected stations in 2005
Fig. II.4.40 Annual average concentrations of arsenic in the ambient air in 1996–2005 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.41 Field of annual average concentration of arsenic in the ambient air in 2005
Fig. II.4.42 1/14-day average concentrations of arsenic in the ambient air at selected stations in 2005
Fig. II.4.43 Annual average concentrations of nickel in the ambient air in 1996–2005 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.44 1/14-day average concentrations of nickel in the ambient air at selected stations in 2005
Fig. II.4.45 Annual average concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene in 1997–2005 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.46 Field of annual average concentration of benzo(a)pyrene in the ambient air in 2005
Fig. II.4.47 24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene in 2005
Fig. II.4.48 Trends of SO2, PM10, NO2, NOx and O3 annual characteristics in the Czech Republic, 1996–2005
Fig. II.4.49 Annual average concentrations of SO2 in 1996–2005 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.50 Winter average concentrations of SO2 in 1996/1997–2005/2006 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.51 Field of annual average concentration of SO2 in 2005
Fig. II.4.52 Field of average concentration of SO2 in the winter period 2005/2006
Fig. II.4.53 24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual concentrations of SO2 in 2005
Fig. II.4.54 24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest winter concentrations of SO2 in the winter period 2005/2006
Fig. II.4.55 Annual average concentrations of NOx and NO2 in 1996–2005 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.56 Field of annual average concentration of NOx in 2005
Fig. II.4.57 24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual concentrations of NOx in 2005
Fig. II.4.58 Exposure index AOT40 values of ozone in 1996–2005 at selected stations, average for 5 years
Fig. II.4.59 Field of exposure index AOT40 values, average for 5 years, 2001–2005
Fig. II.4.60 Stations with the highest exposure index AOT40 values in recent 5 years, 2001–2005
Fig. II.4.61 Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to health protection limit values, ozone excluded, 2005
Fig. II.4.62 Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to health protection limit values incl. ozone, 2005
Fig. II.4.63 Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to SO2 and NOx limit values for the protection of ecosystems/vegetation, 2005
Fig. II.4.64 Areas with deteriorated air quality for ecosystems/vegetation, exceedence of limit value incl. AOT40, 2005
Fig. II.5.1 Cessna-TU 206G aeroplane
Fig. II.5.2 Aircraft measurements of nitrogen dioxide, 1.9.2005, 12:49:00–14:20:00 CET
Fig. II.5.3 Aircraft measurements of ground-level ozone, 1.9.2005, 12:49:00–14:20:00 CET
Fig. II.5.4 O3 and NO2 concentration profiles in the direction of prevailing circulation, 1.9.2005, 12:59:00–14:20:00 CET
Fig. II.7.1 Average hourly NO2 concentrations at the station Prague 2-Legerova, 1.1.2005–28.2.2005
Fig. II.7.2 Course of maximum daily temperatures, their normal and daily total precipitation at Prague-Libuš station. Occurrence of ozone concentrations exceeding 180 μg.m-3 on the territory of the Czech Republic, 1.4.2005–30.9.2005
Fig. II.7.3 Spatial distribution of maximum hourly concentrations of ground-level ozone on the territory of the Czech Republic, 29.7.2005
Fig. III.1 Station networks monitoring precipitation quality and atmospheric deposition, 2005
Fig. III.2 Fields of annual wet deposition of sulphur (SO42-–S), 2005
Fig. III.3 Fields of annual dry deposition of sulphur (SO2–S), 2005
Fig. III.4 Fields of annual total deposition of sulphur, 2005
Fig. III.5 Fields of annual throughfall deposition of sulphur, 2005
Fig. III.6 Fields of annual wet deposition of nitrogen (NO3-–N), 2005
Fig. III.7 Fields of annual wet deposition of nitrogen (NH4+–N), 2005
Fig. III.8 Fields of annual total wet deposition of nitrogen, 2005
Fig. III.9 Fields of annual dry deposition of nitrogen (NOx–N), 2005
Fig. III.10 Fields of annual total deposition of nitrogen, 2005
Fig. III.11 Fields of annual wet deposition of hydrogen ions, 2005
Fig. III.12 Fields of annual dry deposition of hydrogen ions corresponding to SO2 and NOx deposition, 2005
Fig. III.13 Fields of annual total deposition of hydrogen ions, 2005
Fig. III.14 Fields of annual wet deposition of fluoride ions, 2005
Fig. III.15 Fields of annual wet deposition of chloride ions, 2005
Fig. III.16 Fields of annual wet deposition of lead ions, 2005
Fig. III.17 Fields of annual dry deposition of lead, 2005
Fig. III.18 Fields of annual wet deposition of cadmium ions, 2005
Fig. III.19 Fields of annual dry deposition of cadmium, 2005
Fig. III.20 Fields of annual wet deposition of nickel ions, 2005
Fig. III.21 Annual wet deposition at selected stations between 1991 and 2005, the Czech Republic
Fig. III.22 Annual deposition of sulphur (SO42-–S, SO2–S) and oxidated forms of nitrogen (NO3-–N, NOx–N) and hydrogen in the Czech Republic, 1995–2005